The Brutality of Christianity Powered by Geopolitics

Previous | Next | Summary Mode

The Brutality of Christianity Powered by Geopolitics

Faisal Alsagoff

From the battlefields of ancient Israel to the flags of modern Europe, faith and power have long marched together. The fusion began at Constantine’s Milvian Bridge — the first Christian holy battle — and evolved into centuries of conquest where the cross became a symbol of both salvation and subjugation. This article traces the transformation of Christianity from spiritual revolution to geopolitical force, revealing how Saul’s pride, Constantine’s vision, and Hitler’s delusion shared a single disease: the ego’s hunger to act in God’s name. It confronts the moral paradox of ḥērem warfare — “devotion to destruction” — and exposes how sacred texts, when stripped of their ethical context, became blueprints for empire. At its heart lies a warning: when faith bows to ambition, the divine turns into domination, and the message of love is lost beneath the banners of power.

Previous | Next | Summary Mode


Christianity began as a message of love, forgiveness and humility. Yet throughout history, it has been repeatedly weaponised to justify power, conquest and domination. When religion and politics fused, the cross became both a banner of salvation and a sword of oppression. The tragic truth is that much of the violence committed in the name of God was never about faith — it was about empire.

#1. The Birth of Power Through Faith

When Constantine I adopted Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire in the 4th century, faith ceased to be purely spiritual. It became geopolitical. The Roman Empire, once persecutor of Christians, now used the church to control and unify its territories. Bishops wielded as much influence as generals. Conversion became a matter of state policy — a tool for social conformity and imperial cohesion.

#2. Crusades: Holy War as Geopolitical Ambition

The Crusades (1095–1291) were launched under the banner of Christ, but beneath the cloak of piety lay ambition — land, wealth and control of trade routes. Popes promised eternal salvation to those who killed in God’s name. Entire cities like Jerusalem and Antioch were drenched in blood. An estimated 1 to 3 million died in these “holy” wars. The fusion of political and spiritual zeal birthed centuries of violence justified by scripture and sanctioned by kings.

#3. The Reformation and the Wars of Faith

The Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) and other conflicts following the Protestant Reformation were marketed as theological struggles but were really geopolitical contests for territory, power and influence. Catholics and Protestants each claimed divine truth and moral superiority. From the massacre of civilians to the burning of villages, theology became a flag of division. God’s name was stamped on every sword and every cannon.

#4. The Slavery Debate and the American Civil War

In 19th-century America, Christianity was central to both sides of the slavery debate. Southern preachers quoted scripture to defend human bondage, claiming that Africans were destined to serve. Northern abolitionists invoked the same Bible to argue for equality before God. This theological conflict helped fuel the American Civil War (1861–1865) which claimed over 600,000 lives. The tragedy was that a nation of believers found divine justification for owning and whipping their fellow men.

#5. Colonialism: The Cross and the Sword

European colonisation (15th–19th centuries) was driven by the twin engines of faith and empire. Missionaries accompanied conquistadors. The Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch and British all claimed they were spreading the light of Christ while plundering gold, land and souls. Up to 40 million Native Americans died from disease, forced labour and slaughter following the Spanish conquest (the figure is contested but indicative). The Dutch in Indonesia executed entire villages, declaring it divine destiny. Africa was carved up and baptised in blood, its people enslaved under the illusion of spiritual salvation.

#6. Hitler and the Misuse of Divine Mandate

Adolf Hitler, though not a devout Christian, often used religious rhetoric to sanctify his hatred. One exact quote from his manifesto Mein Kampf reads:

“**Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.**” (Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, p. 65) :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}

His Nazi regime twisted Christian symbols and language into propaganda tools. Churches in Germany were divided—some resisted, others blessed the Reich. The Holocaust, which killed six million Jews, exposed how faith can be perverted to justify unimaginable evil when fused with nationalism and ideology.

#7. America’s Manifest Destiny and the Christian Empire

Few ideologies illustrate the fusion of faith and politics as vividly as Manifest Destiny. In the 19th century, this belief proclaimed that the expansion of the United States across the North American continent was preordained by God. It was more than nationalism — it was theology disguised as destiny. Presidents invoked divine right; preachers thundered from pulpits; and settlers, armed with rifles and Bibles, moved westward believing they were executing heaven’s plan.

This ideology emerged from the same spiritual soil that had birthed the Puritans — a people who saw themselves as a “new Israel,” chosen to build a promised land. As America grew, that vision morphed into a justification for conquest. The annexation of Texas, the Mexican-American War, and the displacement of countless Native tribes were framed not as aggression but as divine inheritance. The continent was seen as an empty Eden awaiting God’s chosen republic.

Every advance westward came with sermons of salvation and banners of civilisation. Yet beneath the rhetoric lay devastation. The Trail of Tears alone killed thousands of Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole people — forced from their ancestral lands in death marches that violated every principle of the Gospel. Churches built missions over indigenous graves, blessing the plough that broke sacred soil. The Gospel of Christ became, for many tribes, the Gospel of conquest.

#8. The Church, Capital, and Modern Geopolitics

Even today, religion remains a powerful political force. Christian lobbies shape policies in Washington. Evangelical groups influence elections, foreign aid and wars in the Middle East. The modern church’s silence on global injustices — from bombing campaigns to systemic inequality — shows how political convenience often outweighs moral conviction. The same institutions that preach love often fund hate.

#9. Canon, Power and the Old Testament: A Critical Analysis

Here we examine how the scriptural foundation itself, especially in the Old Testament, became entangled with political and military power. Books such as Joshua, Samuel and Kings depict conquest, divine sanction of war, land seizure, genocide and the fusion of God-, king- and warrior-power. When those texts are treated as canonical (i.e., divinely authoritarian), believers are primed to accept the fusion of religion and empire.

Some popular narratives claim that the First Council of Nicaea (325 CE) formally excluded many Old Testament books or demoted them to deuterocanonical status. But historically, the claim has no basis: “There is no historical basis for the idea that the Council of Nicaea established the canon and created the Bible.”

Nevertheless, the very idea of canonical versus deuterocanonical books is deeply political. If certain books are elevated, others suppressed, the church exerts power over which histories, which wars, which divine‐justifications are officially recognized. The use of Joshua’s conquest narrative or Kings’ accounts of territorial war become tools in a theology of power, not merely faith.

Thus one can imagine a scenario: If Joshua, Samuel and Kings were demoted to “deuterocanonical” status (less authoritative) or even non-canonical, the theological justification for conquest in the name of God would be weakened. Yet because they remain canonical, they serve as an ideological bridge between divine mandate and geopolitical power. The Christian tradition that absorbed them thus reinforced a militant theology: where kings fought, God led; where empire expanded, Jesus conquered in the future but Moses already did the present.

#16. Moral Archetypes: From Faith to Fanaticism

Throughout history, power has sought moral legitimacy. The leaders who shaped religious destiny often began with spiritual sincerity but ended in moral ruin. The stories of Moses, Saul, Constantine, and Hitler show how divine conviction, when distorted by ego and ambition, mutates into destruction.

#16.1 Moses: The Lawgiver and the Line

Moses began as a reluctant prophet, chosen to liberate the oppressed. He confronted tyranny through divine mandate, not personal ambition. Yet even Moses’s story bears warning — the violent conquest of Canaan and the law of annihilation (“devote them to destruction”) became later theological ammunition for empires. His mission to deliver freedom became the textual seed for holy conquest when stripped of moral context. Moses taught obedience to God, but his followers sometimes learned obedience to power.

#16.2 Saul: The Fall of the Anointed

Saul represents the tragic corruption of divine appointment. He began with faith, humility, and courage, yet pride infected his spirit. When he presumed to act in God’s name without obedience, his kingship decayed. In his downfall we see the first psychological arc of zeal corrupted by ego — anointed authority turning into spiritual blindness. Saul’s path reveals the peril of mistaking personal desire for divine purpose.

#16.3 Constantine: The Political Baptism of Christianity

The turning point came at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in AD 312 — the first conflict fought under a Christian symbol. Constantine faced his rival Maxentius for control of Rome. On the eve of battle, he claimed to see a divine vision: a cross of light in the sky with the words, “In hoc signo vinces” — “In this sign, conquer.”

He ordered his soldiers to paint the Chi-Rho, the Greek monogram of Christ, on their shields. When he triumphed the next day, Constantine believed victory came through the Christian God. That belief changed history. The cross, once an instrument of suffering, became an imperial standard. Faith had entered the battlefield — sanctified, armed, and state-endorsed. It was the first Christian holy battle.

Constantine’s subsequent actions fused politics with piety. He legalized Christianity through the Edict of Milan (AD 313), ended persecutions, and later presided over the Council of Nicaea to unify doctrine. Yet his rule also blurred divine mission with imperial power. The same empire that once crucified Christians now killed in Christ’s name. The sword that had pierced the side of faith was now wrapped in its banner.

This was the baptism of geopolitics into religion — a turning point when salvation met strategy. Constantine did not invent the corruption of faith, but he institutionalized it. From his reign onward, emperors and kings would wage wars believing heaven had signed their orders. The Milvian Bridge did not only cross the Tiber; it crossed the sacred into the profane.

#16.4 Hitler: Ego as False Divinity

Adolf Hitler’s perversion of faith was the most malignant form of Saul’s disease. He echoed divine purpose but meant personal vengeance. His claim, “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord,” was not theology — it was self-deification. Like Saul, he began invoking moral destiny; like Constantine, he used religion to unify; but unlike either, he destroyed all moral restraint. His faith was his ego. His god was himself.

#16.5 The Cycle of Sacred Power

Moses, Saul, Constantine, and Hitler form a grim lineage — from revelation to rebellion, from humility to hubris. The pattern is universal: the moment faith is harnessed to justify domination, it ceases to be divine. The church, the crown, and the dictator each repeat the same delusion — that God authorises their ambition. The lesson endures: the greater the claim to holiness, the greater the danger when conscience is silenced.

The marriage of religion and politics births monsters. Every age rediscovers Saul’s pride, Constantine’s calculation, and Hitler’s delusion in new forms. True spirituality must remain separate from power, or it will always serve it. Faith that conquers others destroys itself. Faith that conquers ego redeems the world.

#17. The Cross on the Flags of Empire

The shadow of Constantine’s vision still flies across Europe. Many national flags — from the United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, and others — bear the Christian cross or its variations. These emblems, carried into centuries of battle and colonization, trace their lineage back to the Milvian Bridge. What began as a divine symbol of sacrifice evolved into a mark of dominion and conquest.

Through the Crusades and imperial wars, the cross was painted on shields, stitched on banners, and hoisted on ships that sailed to subjugate distant lands. When British, Spanish, and Portuguese empires expanded, they did so under flags sanctified by Christian imagery. The message to conquered peoples was unmistakable — the conqueror came with God’s blessing.

Even secular Europe has not fully escaped this inheritance. The modern tricolors and heraldic crosses remain cultural relics of an age when the church and the sword marched as one. The blood-red fields of many flags echo centuries of “holy” warfare — from Jerusalem to Vienna, from the New World to the Indian Ocean. Each flag tells a story of faith transformed into authority, and salvation turned into sovereignty.

The irony endures: a symbol born from a man crucified by empire became the emblem of empires themselves. In every battlefield where those flags once flew, the cross stood both as a promise of eternal life — and a justification for death.

#18. Zionist Christianity: Faith Captured by Geopolitics

In modern times, the marriage of religion and politics finds its most explosive expression in Zionist Christianity. Born in 19th-century Britain and America, this movement fused Protestant eschatology with nationalist ideology. It teaches that the modern State of Israel fulfils biblical prophecy, and that supporting Israel — right or wrong — is a divine mandate. What began as theology became foreign policy.

In the United States, Zionist Christian lobbying has shaped decades of unconditional support for Israel. Churches preach that blessing Israel ensures divine favour for America, citing Genesis 12:3 — “I will bless those who bless you.” This interpretation, stripped of moral context, transforms faith into political armour. It absolves any crime committed by the state so long as it waves the Star of David. From Gaza to the West Bank, settler violence, land seizures, and military strikes are reframed as fulfilment of prophecy, not violation of justice.

God & Power: A Deadly Mix

The brutality of Christianity, when powered by geopolitics, is a lesson in how belief can be corrupted by ambition. The fusion of divine and political authority has produced both cathedrals and concentration camps. Jesus preached, “Blessed are the peacemakers,” yet his name was used to bless armies. Faith becomes pure only when it separates itself from power — when the cross is no longer a weapon, but a reminder of sacrifice, humility and unconditional love.

Appendix A — Responsible Casualty Bands

Crusades (1095–1291): ~1–3 million across all theatres. 

Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648): ~4.5–8 million, predominantly civilian mortality from famine/disease. 

U.S. Civil War (1861–1865): ~618k–700k+ total deaths (method-dependent; census-revision midpoint ≈698k). 

Americas “Great Dying” (c.1492–1600): ≈56 million, ~90% regional depopulation in many areas. 

Banda Islands (1609–1621): Thousands killed/enslaved; society shattered; widely termed genocide.

Appendix B — Canon & War: How Specific Books Were Used

Deuteronomy/Joshua: ḥērem warfare texts (“devote to destruction”) later cited to sacralise conquest. Ethical debates today emphasise hyperbole, archaeology, and genre. 

Judges: Cycles of violence depict a norm of tribal holy war, easy to misuse for militancy.

1–2 Samuel: Royal consolidation links kingship with divine sanction for campaigns.

1–2 Kings: National fidelity maps onto military fortune, a template for providential realpolitik.

1–2 Maccabees (Deuterocanonical): Martyrdom and armed resistance inspired later sacral patriotisms; they also fed courage narratives for oppressed minorities. 

Judith, Baruch, Wisdom, Sirach, Tobit (Deuterocanonical): Less “conquest”, more moral wisdom, diaspora endurance, and piety. Their canonical status varies by tradition. 

Key takeaway: When war-narratives are read as binding, not bounded by context and genre, they become political fuel. A canon hierarchy can either encourage or neutralise that fuel.

Appendix C — Notes for Colonial “Christian” Conquest

Iberian Empires (1492–c.1700): Caribbean, Mexico, Andes, and beyond. Missions paired with encomienda and forced labour; catastrophic disease mortality. Use 1492–1600 as core mortality window. 

British & French North America (17th–19th c.): Settler colonialism framed by providence; removals (e.g., Cherokee Trail of Tears) sit within “Manifest Destiny.” 

Dutch Indonesia (17th c.): Banda genocide (1621) for nutmeg monopoly; theology and monopoly intertwined. Mark Banda at 4–6°S, 129–131°E. 

General tip for cartography: Layer religious justifications (sermons, edicts, manifestos) over territorial change. Treat “mission frontiers” as cultural-legal zones rather than pure battlefronts.

References

Battle, M. (2007) *The Crusades: Islam and Christianity in the Struggle for World Supremacy.* New York: Bantam.
Brown, P. (2003) *The Rise and Fall of Christian Europe.* London: Penguin.
Christianson, G. (2015) ‘Christianity, Slavery and Empire’, *Journal of Religious History*, 39(2), pp. 112-130.
Cline, A. (2023) ‘Adolf Hitler on God: Quotes Expressing Belief and Faith’, *Learn Religions*, 5 Apr. Available at: [https://www.learnreligions.com/adolf-hitler-on-god-quotes-248193] (Accessed 30 Oct 2025).
Hastings, D. (2010) *Catholicism and the Roots of Nazism.* Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kershaw, I. (2008) *Hitler: A Biography.* London: W.W. Norton.
Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. (3rd ed.), (2005) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearse, R. (2019) ‘The Second Council of Nicaea / Nicaea in 787 and the Canon of the New Testament’, *Roger-Pearse Weblog*, 1 May. Available at: [https://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/2019/05/01/second-council-of-nicea-the-canon-of-the-new-testament] (Accessed 30 Oct 2025).
White, R.C. (2018) ‘Colonialism, Christianity and Conquest’, *Past & Present*, 232(1), pp. 156-179.

Previous | Next | Summary Mode

Back to blog